Why Should And Need To Be Accompanied By A Lawyer/Advocacy When Examined At The Police?

When we get a police call, we may be afraid even though there is no crime we have committed. Although it is a natural thing, but this fear can be misused by irresponsible parties. Looking back, there have been many cases of wrongful arrest or even planned crimes and the suspects have also been determined by the police. To avoid this, before we respond to a call from the police, it’s a good idea to contact attorney mike morse for the best advice. For those of you who still don’t know the importance of the role of a lawyer. When called to be a witness, you can see the following reasons:

I. Accompanied by a lawyer is the right of both the witness and the suspect.
Witnesses or suspects have the right to be accompanied by a lawyer when examined by the police. Accompanied by a lawyer during the examination is the embodiment of the principles of human rights, the principle of presumption of innocence, and equality before the law.

II. Psychologically, knowledge and experience not all witnesses or suspects know the law, so they are vulnerable to being lied to, fooled, or pressured so that they are worried that they cannot provide information freely and correctly.

Everyone has the potential to be reported to the police and then become a witness or suspect. The problem is, not everyone knows the law. Entering the police station, meeting a tall, sturdy policeman, carrying a gun, and having a firm voice, I’m sure not everyone is brave. Moreover, if you are new to the law, have no experience, do not know your rights and what to do when examined. Just imagining it might already be scary, let alone having to be face-to-face and questioned by the police.

The law guarantees that everyone who is examined is free to give information without any coercion, or pressure, let alone torture.

In fact, in practice, it is not uncommon for witnesses or suspects to be examined under pressure, threats and even beatings, and so on to obtain a confession from the person concerned or to agree with the investigator’s suggestion, thereby placing him or her in a guilty position.

These witnesses and suspects no longer provide information freely according to what they have seen, heard and experienced for themselves. But forced or persuaded to follow/approve the “scenario” made by police officers. As a result, the information given was completely untrue and in fact incriminated the witness or suspect.

For example: the testimony that the witness gave made this witness even have his status upgraded to a suspect because he was forced or coerced into admitting an act he had never committed. Or a suspect who should not have been wrong but was forced or persuaded to admit that he was wrong, or his statement was manipulated so as to exacerbate his guilt, even though this was not the case.

Under such conditions, the general public cannot do much, because they do not know, are afraid, and are not given the opportunity to explain or provide clarification. If we explain the truth, it will be called a lie.